Current:Home > ScamsPublishers Clearing House to pay $18.5 million settlement for deceptive sweepstakes practices -EquityZone
Publishers Clearing House to pay $18.5 million settlement for deceptive sweepstakes practices
View
Date:2025-04-18 17:31:33
Publishers Clearing House agreed to pay out $18.5 million for "deceptive and unfair" sweepstakes practices and change several of its business tactics, the Federal Trade Commission said in a news release on Tuesday.
A proposed court order filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York stipulates that the publishing company needs to make substantial changes to how it conducts its sweepstake drawings and entries online. Mostly older and lower-income consumers are lured to the Publishers Clearing House sweepstakes by catchy language on the company's website such as: "WIN IT!," or "Win for Life!," an FTC complaint said.
Some are lucky: one Pennsylvania-based woman won a $1 million dollar sweepstake prize. Others hope to win money in the sweepstakes and keep purchasing products or paying fees to increase their limited chances, court documents said.
After hopeful customers click on sweepstakes registration links emailed to them by the company, they are directed to several web pages of advertisements for products, including magazine subscriptions, the complaint said. These pages say messages like "$1,000 per week for life AT STAKE!" and "JUST ONE ORDER IS ALL IT TAKES," the news release said.
Consumers interested in entering sweepstakes contests are led to believe "they must order products before they can enter a sweepstake" or that "ordering products increases their odds of winning a sweepstake," the complaint said. One California based-woman thought she won a $5,000 prize, but the company blamed a "technical malfunction" and said that under "official rules" she didn't win and they weren't responsible.
"Today's action builds on previous efforts to crack down on companies that use illegal dark patterns to fuel digital deception and harm consumers," FTC Chair Lina Khan and commissioners said in a statement.
Once consumers enter their email addresses they continue to receive alerts from the company saying that they must take another step to be eligible for sweepstakes prizes, the complaint said. In addition to these misleading practices, Publishers Clearing House hid shipping and handling costs from consumers until there was a financial obligation. While the company also maintained they didn't sell or rent consumer data, the FTC alleges they did as such until around January 2019, when Publishers Clearing House learned they were being investigated, according to court documents.
"While we disagree with the FTC's assertions and have admitted no wrongdoing, we agreed to settle this matter in order to avoid the ongoing expense and distraction of litigation," Christopher Irving, the company's Vice President for Consumer and Legal Affairs, said in a statement.
"The integrity of our sweepstakes prizes and awards was never questioned. We worked hard to address any issues the FTC raised," Publishers Clearing House said.
The $18.5 million dollar fund will be used to refund consumers and implement promised changes to Publishers Clearing House's business practices. These changes include making clear disclosures on their sweepstake entry web pages, stopping surprise fees and shipping charges and stopping deceptive emails, court documents said.
- In:
- Federal Trade Commission
Cara Tabachnick is a news editor for CBSNews.com. Contact her at cara.tabachnick@cbsinteractive.com
veryGood! (83579)
Related
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
- Stock market today: Asian stocks track Wall Street gains ahead of central bank meetings
- Taylor Swift's YouTube live during Germany show prompts Swifties to speculate surprise announcement
- Gospel group the Nelons being flown by Georgia state official in fatal Wyoming crash
- Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
- Who is Doctor Doom? Robert Downey Jr.'s shocking Marvel casting explained
- Noah Lyles doubles down on belief he’s fastest man in the world: 'It's me'
- 2024 Olympics: Gymnast Jade Carey Shares Why She Fell During Floor Routine
- Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
- Olympic medals today: What is the medal count at 2024 Paris Games on Monday?
Ranking
- Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
- 11-year-old accused of swatting, calling in 20-plus bomb threats to Florida schools
- USA's Katie Grimes, Emma Weyant win Olympic swimming silver, bronze medals in 400 IM
- Orioles catcher James McCann struck in nose by 94 mph pitch, stays in game
- Paige Bueckers vs. Hannah Hidalgo highlights women's basketball games to watch
- Jessica Springsteen goes to Bruce and E Street Band show at Wembley instead of Olympics
- Lana Condor Details “Sheer Devastation” After Death of Mom Mary Condor
- 'The Penguin' debuts new trailer, Colin Farrell will return for 'Batman 2'
Recommendation
Bodycam footage shows high
From discounted trips to free books, these top hacks will help you nab deals
How Brazil's Rebeca Andrade, world's other gymnasts match up with Simone Biles at Olympics
Paris Olympics highlights: Team USA wins golds Sunday, USWNT beats Germany, medal count
Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
Iowa now bans most abortions after about 6 weeks, before many women know they’re pregnant
Iowa now bans most abortions after about 6 weeks, before many women know they’re pregnant
Federal Reserve is edging closer to cutting rates. The question will soon be, how fast?